Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10620/19130
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWatson, Nicole-
dc.contributor.authorJin, Yihua-
dc.contributor.authorSummerfield, Michelle-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-10T03:24:46Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-10T03:24:46Z-
dc.date.issued2021-12-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10620/19130-
dc.description.abstractThis paper describes the various changes made to the administration of wave 20 and then compares the quality of the data with the previous two waves. The aspects of data quality examined include response rates, response timing, missing data, use of multi-item response options, responses chosen for questions with long response lists, straight lining, rounding, and the length of responses provided at open-ended questions.en
dc.titleHILDA Project Discussion Paper Series Wave 20 data quality and the impact of questionnaire and fieldwork changes due to the COVID-19 pandemicen
dc.typeReports and technical papersen
dc.identifier.urlhttps://melbourneinstitute.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/3969310/hdps121.pdfen
dc.identifier.surveyHILDAen
dc.description.institutionMelbourne Instituteen
dc.title.reportHILDA Project Discussion Papersen
dc.description.pagesDiscussion Paper No. 1/21en
dc.subject.dssSurveys and survey methodologyen
dc.relation.surveyHILDAen
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypeReports and technical papers-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
Appears in Collections:Technical Papers
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

164
checked on Dec 12, 2024
Google icon

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.