Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10620/18418
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Hart, Kerry | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cassidy, Jack | - |
dc.contributor.author | Marett, Georgia | - |
dc.contributor.author | Rutherford, Jack | - |
dc.contributor.author | Siriwardena, Pravin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hodge, Wendy | - |
dc.contributor.author | Christian, Fiona | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-03-22T01:47:51Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-03-22T01:47:51Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021-01-21 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10620/18418 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Open Support engaged ARTD Consultants to evaluate the Visit Program to assess the appropriateness of the service model, the benefits of the program to clients, and its cost-efficiency. The evaluation used a mixed-methods design, synthesising qualitative data collected from program staff, volunteer coordinators, visitors, and clients, with quantitative data from client surveys, HILDA Wave 18 Survey data and program activity and costs data. The evaluation sought to answer questions about whether or not the program reduces the negative effects of social isolation and if any components of the service model should be changed and the client group expanded. The evaluation found that Visit Program is highly valued by partner agencies, program staff and clients because it fills a service need not met by other providers where it is offered. Clients feel less socially isolated and look forward to the visits from their visitor, enjoy the activities they do with them, and appreciate having someone to talk to confidentially, who is non-judgmental and can offer advice or a new perspective. Overall, the economic evaluation showed that the Visit Program is a sound investment for the community. A cost-benefit analysis showed that Visit Program is delivering economic value to the community with a benefit-cost ratio of roughly 2:1 and a net benefit of over $500,000 largely due to the program’s impact on its clients’ quality of life. | en |
dc.title | Evaluation of the Visit Program: Final Report | en |
dc.type | Books | en |
local.subject.policy | Theses and student dissertations | en |
dc.identifier.survey | HILDA | en |
dc.description.institution | ARTD Consultants on behalf of Open Support | en |
dc.description.keywords | Social isolation | en |
dc.description.keywords | Loneliness | en |
dc.identifier.email | kerry.hart@artd.com.au | en |
dc.identifier.email | fiona.christian@artd.com.au | en |
dc.date.financialyear | 2020 | en |
dc.subject.dss | Disadvantage, adversity and resilience | en |
dc.subject.dss | Health and wellbeing | en |
dc.subject.dss | Social engagement | en |
dc.contributor.corpauthor | ARTD Consultants | en |
dc.relation.survey | HILDA | en |
dc.old.surveyvalue | HILDA | en |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.openairetype | Books | - |
item.grantfulltext | open | - |
Appears in Collections: | Reports |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
Open Support Visit Program Final Report_20201202.docx | 3.61 MB | Microsoft Word XML | View/Open |
Page view(s)
450
checked on Dec 5, 2024
Download(s)
230
checked on Dec 5, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.