Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10620/18216
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorO'Donnell, James-
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-13T03:42:08Zen
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-27T06:47:49Zen
dc.date.available2017-09-27T06:47:49Zen
dc.date.issued2017-09-27-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10620/18216en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10620/4365en
dc.description.abstractI will present a multistate demographic approach for analysing the longitudinal dynamics of housing and homelessness. The approach is applied to a sample of highly disadvantaged individuals in Australia who are thought to be experiencing, at risk of or vulnerable to homelessness to assess how well private housing markets and interpersonal support networks provide stable and secure housing trajectories vis-à-vis public and community (social) housing. This is particularly important given declining investment in public housing in recent decades and the greater emphasis placed on private rental markets and interpersonal support networks in housing vulnerable populations. A multi-level survival model is specified to estimate the hazards of exiting a current accommodation episode to one of five different housing and homeless states. Model outputs are applied to a multistate life table model to estimate the duration of episodes and the incidence and duration of subsequent episodes of homelessness. The results suggest that housing trajectories within this population are highly volatile particularly for those outside social housing. Private housing markets carry an increased risk of housing exit with the homes of family and friends being the most common destination. The housing support of family and friends, in turn, is very prevalent and important among this population but is usually time limited and often precipitates multiple and repeated episodes staying with family and friends as well as more severe forms of homelessness. These findings warrant policy consideration as to how housing markets can provide better affordability and security for low income households.en
dc.subjectHousing -- Equity (including use of)en
dc.subjectHousing -- Conditionsen
dc.subjectHousing -- Government assistanceen
dc.titleMren
dc.typeConference Presentationsen
local.contributor.institutionSchool of Demography ANUen
dc.identifier.surveyJHen
dc.description.keywordsmultistate life tableen
dc.description.keywordshousing policy evaluationen
dc.description.keywordshousing disadvantaged populationsen
dc.description.conferencelocationSydney, Australiaen
dc.description.conferencenameNational Housing Conferenceen
dc.identifier.refereedNoen
local.identifier.id4959en
dc.description.formatPresentationen
dc.identifier.emailJames O'Donnell, School of Demography ANU, Acton ACT 2601en
dc.date.conferencestart2017-11-29-
dc.date.conferencefinish2017-12-01-
dc.date.presentation2017-12-01-
dc.subject.dssHousing, communities and neighbourhoodsen
dc.subject.dssmaincategoryHousingen
dc.subject.dsssubcategoryGovernment assistanceen
dc.subject.dsssubcategoryConditionsen
dc.subject.dsssubcategoryEquity (including use of)en
dc.subject.flosseHousing, community and neighbourhoodsen
dc.relation.surveyJHen
dc.old.surveyvalueJHen
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeConference Presentations-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Conference Presentations
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

114
checked on Mar 29, 2024
Google icon

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.