Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10620/18063
Longitudinal Study: HILDA
Title: Greenspace, physical activity and wellbeing in Australian capital cities: How does population size moderate the relationship?
Authors: Ambrey, Christopher 
Ambrey, C. L. 
Ambrey, C 
Issue Date: 8-Dec-2015
Keywords: Greenspace
Psychological distress
Mental health
Wellbeing
Physical activity
Abstract: Objectives: The purpose of this study is to investigate the synergy between greenspace and physical activity and its implications for wellbeing. In particular, how this synergy may depend on population size in the neighbourhood. Study design: Cross-sectional analysis of resident-level responses from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey for 2013 subset to Australia’s major capital cities linked to Geographic Information Systems (GIS) data. Methods: GIS data on greenspace per capita and Australian Bureau of Statistics data on population size for the neighbourhood are matched to the residents in the HILDA survey on the basis of the Census Collection District in which they reside. A cluster-specific fixed effects model is estimated for the outcomes of mental health and psychological distress. A battery of socio-demographic and location characteristics were also adjusted for. Interaction terms are used to discern the extent to which population size may moderate any synergistic wellbeing benefits associated with physical activity and greenspace. This question is ultimately operationalised as a three-way interaction effect (greenspace × physical activity × population size). Results: The results indicate that physical activity is most strongly and positively associated with mental health (statistically significant at the 1% level), with an estimated coefficient of 0.6307. The results also reveal that physical activity is negatively associated with psychological distress (statistically significant at the 10% level), with an estimated coefficient of -0.2447. Unexpectedly, for both mental health and psychological distress the greenspace and population variables are not found to have separate statistically significant effects. Furthermore, while the results fail to find, on average, the hypothesised synergy between greenspace and physical activity, a closer inspection reveals that this link may depend on the population size of a neighbourhood. The interaction term for greenspace, physical activity and population bears a coefficient estimate of 0.0033, statistically significant at the 5% level in the mental health regression and a coefficient of -0.0032, statistically significant at the 1% level in the psychological distress regression. Conclusion: The results indicate that physical activity is linked differently to mental health and psychological distress. The results initially provide no evidence of the hypothesised greenspace-physical activity synergy. The results provide evidence that this synergy is greater in more in more populated neighbourhoods.
URL: http://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjZjJ-omMvJAhUDmpQKHXakDlMQFggeMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.regionalstudies.org%2Fuploads%2FAn_investigation_into_the_synergistic_wellbeing_benefits_of_greenspace_and_physical_activity_-_Christopher_Ambrey.pdf&usg=AFQjCNHPsoMciZSLIzAY3AVDG5Rs2SqOKQ
Keywords: Health -- Mental; Actvities -- Outdoor activities; Health -- Physical activity; Health -- Wellbeing
Research collection: Journal Articles
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

8
checked on Oct 19, 2021

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.