Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Longitudinal Study:||HILDA||Title:||Work—life conflict: Is work time or work overload more important?||Authors:||Pocock, B
|Issue Date:||Dec-2008||Pages:||13 pages (303-315)||Keywords:||Work-life conflict
|Abstract:||Work time in the form of long hours or control over work scheduling (flexibility) dominates much of the debate, and organisational policies and interventions, around sustaining a healthy work—life relationship. In this study we challenge this assumption, and argue instead for the importance of the quantity of work (work overload). Using data collected in a national Australian study, we found that work overload was the strongest predictor of full-time employees' work—life conflict. Work hours, their fit with preferences, and control over work scheduling also demonstrated small to moderate associations with work—life conflict. This study indicates that time-based work—life policies, procedures and interventions are necessary, but not sufficient, for addressing work—life conflict. Effective management of work overload, with its potential to contribute to emotional strain/exhaustion and long work hours, should be considered as a keystone strategy to support a healthy work—life relationship.||URL:||http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1177/1038411108095761/abstract||Keywords:||Employment -- Hours; Employment -- Work/life Balance||Research collection:||Journal Articles|
|Appears in Collections:||Journal Articles|
Show full item record
checked on Oct 19, 2021
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.